Annex 1: Evaluation and Research Committee Submission (Template)
Annex 1: Evaluation and Research Committee Submission (Template)
click here to save this template to edit as your submission document, then delete all instructions
typed in blue.
Programme(s):
AMS Activity Number (if applicable)
Title of Review/Evaluation/Research report:
Review/Evaluation or Research Team:
NZAID’s cost of Review/Evaluation/Research:
If joint with another donor/agency, with whom (and total cost):
Submitted By:_________________ Date:
Advice On TORs By:
Advice On Evaluation/Research Plan By:
Report Peer Reviewed By:
Report Appraised By:
Submission Cleared By:
This review/evaluation/research report has been stored in the ERRC or RRC as appropriate, and electronic copies forwarded to Evaluation Team Group Administrator.
(Type “confirmed” and initials or name in brackets here to confirm that this has been done)
Background
This, and the next section, should be very brief. There is no need to repeat or comprehensively summarise material from the Terms of Reference or from the Executive Summary of the report, both of which are appended to the Submission and can be simply referred to.
Key Findings of the Study
Comment on the Quality of the Study
This should be very brief and draw on the appraisal comments of the final report and the peer reviews of draft reports. Appraisal comments are appended in full and hence do not need to be repeated at any length. The final decision on quality is with the staff (eg the programme team) that commissioned the review, evaluation or research study (drawing on advice as appropriate).
Recommendations from the study
|
Rec. No. |
Recommendation |
Proposed NZAID Response |
A/D |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Further Programme Recommendations
Programme Team recommendation on withholding the report if asked for by stakeholders, and consequently whether the summary should be placed on the NZAID website.
- There are reasonable grounds to withhold the report OR
- The report should be released and a summary placed on the NZAID website
Add any additional recommendations, ie additional to those emerging from the recommendations of the report
Lessons Learned
Learning for NZAID’s Organisational Development:
(e.g. NZAID administration, activity management, information storage or knowledge management practices, systems and processes that could be improved)
Learning for Improving Development Practice:
(e.g. aspects of an Activity’s or Programme’s relevance, design, implementation, that could be improved or replicated in other contexts)
Learning for Improving reviews/evaluations/research studies:
Appendices
Attach the following as appendices and delete this bullet section of instructions from your submission:
- Executive Summary
- TOR for the review/evaluation/research
- Appraisal comments
- A completed and signed Report Release Checklist